Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation
  1. Aynsley Cowie1,
  2. John Buckley2,
  3. Patrick Doherty3,
  4. Gill Furze4,
  5. Jo Hayward5,
  6. Sally Hinton6,
  7. Jennifer Jones7,
  8. Linda Speck8,
  9. Hasnain Dalal9,
  10. Joseph Mills10
  11. on behalf of the British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR)
  1. 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation Lister Centre, University Hospital Crosshouse, Scotland, UK
  2. 2 Centre for Active Living, University Centre Shrewsbury, Shrewsbury, UK
  3. 3 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
  4. 4 Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
  5. 5 Cardiac Rehabilitation, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
  6. 6 British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, London, UK
  7. 7 Physiotherapy, Brunel University London, London, UK
  8. 8 Health Psychology Service, ABM University Health Board, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK
  9. 9 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
  10. 10 Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Aynsley Cowie, Cardiac Rehabilitation Lister Centre, University Hospital Crosshouse, Scotland KA2 OBE, UK; aynsleycowie{at}nhs.net

Abstract

In 2017, the British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation published its official document detailing standards and core components for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Building on the success of previous editions of this document (published in 2007 and 2012), the 2017 update aims to further emphasise to commissioners, clinicians, politicians and the public the importance of robust, quality indicators of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) service delivery. Otherwise, its overall aim remains consistent with the previous publications—to provide a precedent on which all effective cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation programmes are based and a framework for use in assessment of variation in service delivery quality. In this 2017 edition, the previously described seven standards and core components have both been revised to six, with a greater focus on measurable clinical outcomes, audit and certification. The principles within the updated document underpin the six-stage pathway of care for CR, and reflect the extensive evidence base now available within the field. To help improve current services, close collaboration between commissioners and CR providers is advocated, with use of the CR costing tool in financial planning of programmes. The document specifies how quality assurance can be facilitated through local audit, and advocates routine upload of individual-level data to the annual British Heart Foundation National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation, and application for national certification ensuring attainment of a minimum quality standard. Although developed for the UK, these standards and core components may be applicable to other countries.

  • cardiac rehabilitation
  • cardiac risk factors and prevention

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The writing of this paper was coordinated by the main author, AC, supported by HD. Jemma Lough provided additional support as a technical editor of the paper. All of the other authors were part of a ’Standards and Core Components Primary Writing Group', which was co-ordinated by JM. All listed authors contributed to the original version of this manuscript, and to the revisions that were undertaken.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.