HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 29 November 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.104745
Heart 2008;94:211-216
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
hrt.2006.104745v1
94/2/211    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knauth, A L
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knauth, A L
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Ventricular size and function assessed by cardiac MRI predict major adverse clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair

A L Knauth1,2, K Gauvreau1, A J Powell1, M J Landzberg1,2, E P Walsh1, J E Lock1, P J del Nido3, T Geva1

1 Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Boston Adult Congenital Heart Disease Service, Children’s Hospital Boston, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children’s Hospital Boston, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr T Geva, Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; tal.geva{at}cardio.chboston.org

Background: Factors associated with impaired clinical status in a cross-sectional study of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) have been reported previously.

Objectives: To determine independent predictors of major adverse clinical outcomes late after TOF repair in the same cohort during follow-up evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

Methods: Clinical status at latest follow-up was ascertained in 88 patients (median time from TOF repair to baseline evaluation 20.7 years; median follow-up from baseline evaluation to most recent follow-up 4.2 years). Major adverse outcomes included (a) death; (b) sustained ventricular tachycardia; and (c) increase in NYHA class to grade III or IV.

Results: 22 major adverse outcomes occurred in 18 patients (20.5%): death in 4, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 8, and increase in NYHA class in 10. Multivariate analysis identified right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume Z >=7 (odds ratio (OR) = 4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 18.8, p = 0.037) and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <55% (OR = 8.05, 95% CI 2.14 to 30.2, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of outcome with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.850. LV ejection fraction could be replaced by RV ejection fraction <45% in the multivariate model. QRS duration >=180 ms also predicted major adverse events but correlated with RV size.

Conclusions: In this cohort, severe RV dilatation and either LV or RV dysfunction assessed by CMR predicted major adverse clinical events. This information may guide risk stratification and therapeutic interventions.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Arrhythmia ElectrophysiolHome page
M. J. Silka and Y. Bar-Cohen
Should patients with congenital heart disease and a systemic ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% undergo prophylactic implantation of an ICD?: Patients With Congenital Heart Disease and a Systemic Ventricular Ejection Fraction Less Than 30% Should Undergo Prophylactic Implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, October 1, 2008; 1(4): 298 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Arrhythmia ElectrophysiolHome page
J. K. Triedman
Should patients with congenital heart disease and a systemic ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% undergo prophylactic implantation of an ICD?: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Guidelines Based Solely on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Do Not Apply to Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, October 1, 2008; 1(4): 307 - 316.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society