Article Text

Download PDFPDF
An unusual shadow above the aortic valve
  1. Eric McWilliams1,
  2. Kenton Zehr2,
  3. Ali Alshehri1
  1. 1Cardiology Division, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
  2. 2Cardiac Surgery Department, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eric McWilliams, Cardiology Division, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, P.O. Box 11150, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia; eric.mcwilliams{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Clinical introduction A 55-year-old West African man was referred for routine echocardiography. He was completely asymptomatic, a non-smoker, working out at the gym several times weekly. He was taking hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.

Clinical examination revealed a blood pressure of 156/74 mm Hg and systolic and diastolic murmurs suggestive of aortic insufficiency. Pulses were equal bilaterally and he had no marfanoid features or hyperelasticity. ECG showed mild left ventricular hypertrophy and chest X-ray revealed a normal cardiac shadow and mediastinum.

Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated an unusual appearance above the aortic valve (figure 1A), moderate aortic regurgitation and a shadow in the aortic arch. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed to evaluate the dilated aorta, arch and aortic valve further (figure 1B, C). The native aortic valve was trileaflet with moderate regurgitation. CT was also performed (figure 1D).

Question What is the most likely diagnosis?

  1. Acute type A aortic dissection

  2. Williams syndrome

  3. Loa loa worm infection

  4. Intimo-intimal intussusception

  5. Giant cell aortitis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were involved with the clinical care of the patient. EM wrote the draft article and prepared the images and videos. AS and KZ both reviewed and approved the final draft and images.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.