Responses
Editorial
The debate on public place defibrillators: charged but shockingly ill informed
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 23 November 2015
- Published on: 23 November 2015The debate on public place defibrillators: no longer ill informedShow More
Dear Editor
Pell considers the provision of AEDs in public places an inappropriate use of health service funding because at present there is a lack of evidence both of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness to support this strategy.[1]
The basis for this assertion centres on the lack of clinical trials of the use of AEDs in this situation, or a lack of comparative or baseline data in published descript...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.